Consultation
We review the materials and assess the lawfulness of the penalty and the risk of discharge.
MILITARY LAW / 20
A penalty has been imposed on you, or an adverse attestation is being prepared, and discharge on adverse grounds now threatens. We examine the inquiry, prepare objections and challenge the decision in the military court.
A penalty is rarely an end in itself. It is usually a step towards attestation and discharge for failing to meet the terms of the contract. One reprimand becomes a character reference, the reference becomes the attestation board's conclusion, and the man leaves the service on a ground that closes off both his payments and his status.
Breaches in the inquiry itself are constant: no explanation is taken, or it is taken under pressure, the time limits are ignored, a man is punished for conduct that appears nowhere in the papers, or punished twice for the same episode. Penalties are often backdated to fit the attestation.
The attestation is held without you, you see the reference for the first time at the sitting, and nobody accepts your objections. Yet the objections are precisely the document the court will later read. So the time to intervene is during the inquiry, not after the discharge order.
HOW THE WORK IS BUILT
We review the materials and assess the lawfulness of the penalty and the risk of discharge.
We prepare the explanation or objections to the reference and get them registered.
We attend the board with you and record any procedural breaches.
We draft the administrative claim against the penalty, the conclusion and the order.
We conduct the case in the garrison military court and on appeal where needed.
QUESTIONS
Often yes, because a reprimand rarely stays on its own. It is the foundation for the reference and for the attestation board's conclusion. A penalty lifted or set aside removes the basis for that chain, so a dispute costs less at the early stage.
It is. You must be shown the reference and given the chance to submit objections. Where that did not happen, the board's conclusion is open to challenge, and with it the order based on it. Such breaches need to be documented.
Discharge for failing to meet the terms of the contract presupposes substantial and systematic breaches. A single episode is usually not enough, and we say so in the objections and in court. Much depends on the nature of the conduct and on exactly what the materials record.
NEXT STEP
Let us discuss your situation
The consultation is free of charge when an engagement agreement is signed: on it we say whether the matter has prospects and how the work would be built.