Consultation
We study the medical board finding and the expert board papers and identify where the cause or the group was lost.
MILITARY LAW / 12
After a wound or a serious illness you need disability status with the cause recorded as a military injury — payments, pension and benefits all depend on that wording. We prepare the case for the expert board and challenge refusals and understated groups.
The military medical board has found you unfit for service, yet the medical and social expert board either refused disability status or awarded a lower group than your condition warrants. Sometimes the cause is recorded as 'illness contracted during military service' instead of a military injury, and the scope of your rights changes at once.
Often the problem lies not in the board's decision but in the papers: the referral is carelessly drawn up, some examinations were never done, there is no certificate of the wound or no medical board finding on causation. The expert sees an incomplete picture and decides on it.
Re-examination is a separate story. The group is removed or reduced on the basis of improvement, although rehabilitation is unfinished and the lost functions have not returned. That can be challenged too.
HOW THE WORK IS BUILT
We study the medical board finding and the expert board papers and identify where the cause or the group was lost.
We request medical and service records and fill the gaps with the examinations that are missing.
We file objections with the main or Federal board and take part in the fresh examination.
We file the claim, obtain a forensic examination and run the case to judgment.
QUESTIONS
They are different recorded causes, and the scope of rights depends on them: which payments are due and in what amount, the pension terms, the benefits. The cause follows the medical board's finding on causation, which the expert board then carries into the disability papers. That is why a dispute about the wording is argued first with the medical board.
It is often faster and more effective to challenge the decision before the main board first: it holds a fresh examination and can order further tests. Your right to sue is not lost. We assess which route is shorter in your case.
Yes, a decision reducing or withdrawing the group is challenged in the same way as the first one. The key is to show that the lasting impairment persists and that improvement is not confirmed by objective data. This usually calls for a forensic examination.
NEXT STEP
Let us discuss your situation
The consultation is free of charge when an engagement agreement is signed: on it we say whether the matter has prospects and how the work would be built.